🔗 Share this article

Throughout economic booms, there arrive moments when market commentators wonder if optimism has become excessive.

Recent multi-billion dollar agreements involving OpenAI with semiconductor manufacturers Nvidia and AMD have raised concerns about the sustainability of substantial funding toward AI technology.

Why these NVIDIA & AMD Deals Worrying to Financial Observers?

Several analysts voice concern regarding the circular nature in such arrangements. According to the conditions of the Nvidia transaction, OpenAI agrees to pay the chipmaker in cash for chips, and Nvidia commits to invest into OpenAI for non-controlling stakes.

Leading British tech backer James Anderson stated unease regarding similarities with vendor financing, where a company offers monetary support for clients purchasing their goods – a precarious scenario if these customers hold overly optimistic revenue projections.

Vendor financing was among the characteristics during that turn-of-the-millennium dotcom craze.

"It's not quite similar to what many telecommunications providers were up to in 1999-2000, yet there are some rhymes to it. I don't think it leaves me feeling entirely comfortable from that perspective regarding this," commented Anderson.

The Advanced Micro Devices deal also enmeshes OpenAI with a second chip maker alongside Nvidia. Through this deal, OpenAI plans to utilize hundreds of thousands of AMD processors within its data centers – the core infrastructure of artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT – and will have an opportunity to buy 10% in AMD.

All of this is fueled by the insatiable demand from OpenAI as well as competitors to secure the maximum computing power as possible to drive their models to ever greater performance advancements – as well as to meet growing market demand.

Neil Wilson, UK investor strategist at financial firm Saxo, remarked that deals like the NVIDIA & OpenAI all pointed to a situation that "appears, smells and sounds like an economic bubble."

What Represent Additional Indicators of Market Exuberance?

Anderson highlighted soaring valuations at prominent AI firms as another cause for worry. OpenAI is now valued at $500 billion (£372bn), compared with $157bn in October last year, while Anthropic almost tripled its valuation lately, rising from $60bn in March up to $170bn the previous month.

Anderson stated how the magnitude behind these valuation surges "concerned me." According to accounts, OpenAI supposedly recorded sales of $4.3bn during the first half of this year, alongside an operating loss of $7.8bn, according to tech news site The Information.

Recent share price swings have also alarmed seasoned market observers. For instance, AMD temporarily gained $80bn in valuation throughout equity activity this past Monday after the OpenAI news, while Oracle – one profiting due to demand for AI support systems such as data centers – gained about $250 billion in one day in September following announcing stronger than anticipated results.

There is also an enormous capital expenditure boom, which refers to spending on non-personnel costs such as facilities as well as equipment. The big four artificial intelligence "large-scale operators" – Meta's parent Meta, Google parent Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon – are projected to spend $325bn in capital expenditures this year, approximately the economic output belonging to Portugal.

Is AI Adoption Warranting Investor Enthusiasm?

Faith toward artificial intelligence expansion was rattled in August when MIT released research indicating that 95% of companies receive zero return from their investments toward generative AI. Their report stated the problem lay not in the capabilities of AI systems rather the manner in they were used.

It said this was a clear example of a "AI adoption gap", where startups led by 19- or 20-year-olds reporting a jump in revenues through deploying AI technologies.

These findings occurred alongside a substantial fall in AI support stocks including NVIDIA as well as Oracle. This happened 60 days following consulting firm McKinsey, the advisory group, said that eight out of 10 businesses state they utilize genAI, however the same percentage indicate minimal impact upon their bottom line.

McKinsey said this is since AI tools are utilized toward general applications like creating meeting minutes rather than specific purposes such as highlighting risky vendors and generating concepts.

Everything here unnerves investors because a key promise by AI firms like Google, OpenAI and Microsoft is how if you buy their products, they will improve productivity – an indicator of business efficiency – by helping an individual worker accomplish significantly greater profitable work in an average business day.

Nevertheless, we see additional clear indications of broad adoption of AI. Recently, OpenAI announced how ChatGPT currently used by 800 million people weekly, rising from the figure at 500 million mentioned by the company last March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, strongly maintains that interest for paid-for access to AI is going to continue to "steeply increase."

What Does the Bigger Picture Reveal?

Adrian Cox, a thematic strategist with the Deutsche Bank Research Institute, says the current situation seem as if "we're at a pivotal point where the lights show varying colours."

Warning signs, he says, are enormous capital expenditure where "the current generation of chips could be outdated prior to the investment pays off" together with the soaring market caps of privately-held firms such as OpenAI.

Cautionary indicators are over double of the stock values of the "magnificent seven" US technology stocks. This is balanced by their price to earnings ratios – a measure determining if an investment is under- or overvalued – that remain below historical levels